Need help? Email mohsindev369@gmail.com
Cursor and AI-editor app review
Apps built in Cursor, Claude Code or Windsurf look different from Lovable or Bolt projects. The code lives in your own repo, on any stack, and you probably understand parts of it well. The risk is the parts you accepted without reading: hundreds of agent-written changes, each reasonable alone, that add up to a codebase nobody has reviewed end to end.
Short answer: Start with the fixed-price Production Audit. I review the repo the way a senior engineer joining your team would: security first, then structure, tests and deploys. You get a written report in 3 working days with a fixed quote for each fix. The $1,200 fee is credited if you go ahead, and refunded in full if the audit finds no real issues. See a sample report.
Async and in writing, no calls. 5.0 from 107 Fiverr reviews.
Anything, but most often Next.js or React with a Node or Python backend, Postgres or Supabase, deployed on Vercel, Railway, Render or a VPS. I also review React Native apps.
None of this means the tool is bad. It builds what you ask for, and nobody asks for these.
An .env file or a hardcoded key committed once and then removed is still in the history. If the repo was ever shared or public, those keys need rotating.
The agent adds a permission check where you asked for one. The next endpoint it writes, in a different session, doesn't have it. One missing check is enough to expose every record behind that route.
When a test fails, agents sometimes edit or skip the test instead of fixing the code. A green test suite can hide real regressions.
Different sessions pick different libraries and patterns for data fetching, validation and errors. Bugs then have to be fixed in several places.
Schema edits applied directly instead of through migrations, so local, staging and production quietly drift apart.
Each item ends up in the written report with a risk level and a fixed price to fix.
If the report does not find at least one issue ranked medium risk or higher, I refund the whole fee and you keep the report. Medium risk means something that could leak data, lose you money or break a feature for users if left alone. Style preferences and small tidy-ups do not count.
See a sample audit reportNobody needs you to stop using Cursor. The goal is a codebase where the agent does less damage: one pattern per concern, tests that fail loudly, and a rules file that tells the agent how this project works. I can write that rules file as part of the fix so future sessions follow the same conventions.
All in writing, so every finding, decision and price is on record.
Send a short brief on what the app does and who uses it. I reply by email with an invoice for the fixed fee, and the 3 days start once it is paid and I have read-only repo access.
No calls. You write, I read.
Every issue I find, ranked by how much damage it could do, with a plain-English explanation and a fixed price to fix it.
Yours to keep, even if you hire someone else.
Pick the fixes you want. The audit fee comes off the rescue quote, so the audit is free if we keep working together.
Nothing starts until you approve it in writing.
Critical issues first, then the rest. Every change goes through review and a staging link before it touches production.
You own all code and accounts throughout.
Because you wrote the prompts and reviewed the diffs you were worried about. A fresh reader goes through the parts you skimmed, and does it with production incidents in mind.
Both, as far as access allows. Environment variables, hosting settings, database configuration and CI are part of the audit if you share read access. Missing pieces are listed in the report.
Yes. It is one of the cheaper fixes with a large effect: a short, project-specific rules file describing structure, patterns and things never to touch, so each new agent session starts from the same conventions.
Then the report says so, lists the few things worth fixing, and you have a written review to show investors or enterprise customers who ask about security.
A written report in 3 working days, a fixed quote for every fix, and a straight answer on whether to rescue or rebuild.
Full refund if the audit finds nothing ranked medium risk or higher · See a sample report